| 2 | | |
| 3 | | = Annotation Priorities = |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | * 1. Issues on the curation tracker |
| 6 | | * 2. Annotation improving networks inferred from GO: |
| 7 | | * i) substrates |
| 8 | | * ii) physical interactions |
| 9 | | * iii) complexes |
| 10 | | * 3. Phenotype screens see [http://curation.pombase.org/pombe/view/list/triage_phenotype_screen_publications?model=track canto] (big bang for buck) |
| 11 | | * 4. Processes mature enough to build pathways: usually those which have a large percentage of functionally characterised genes (for example mitochondrion organization has 40 published genes/294, so is low priority, compared to cytokinesis 136/139) |
| 12 | | * chromosome segregation (Val) |
| 13 | | * DNA metabolism (Midori) |
| 14 | | * cytokinesis (Val) |
| 15 | | * regulation of mitotic cell cycle (All) |
| 16 | | * signaling pathways (Antonia) |
| 17 | | * chromatin organization (All) |
| 18 | | * cell polarity |
| 19 | | * 5. New gene characterizations -These should be sent out for community curation, but followed up |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | | == Process priorities == |
| 23 | | |
