Changes between Version 15 and Version 16 of CurationToolMultiGenePhenotypes


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 10, 2014, 10:16:18 AM (6 years ago)
Author:
kmr44
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • CurationToolMultiGenePhenotypes

    v15 v16  
    4040=== New thoughts from testing 2014-10-24 (Midori) ===
    4141 * The gene page needs a route back to phenotype curation (in addition to "change gene"). - MAH 2014-10-28: agreed; see ideas from today's call below
    42  * The ontology term page needs route back to term search (at the moment the only option is the paper summary page, and the "back" button does nothing).
     42 * ~~The ontology term page needs route back to term search (at the moment the only option is the paper summary page, and the "back" button does nothing).~~ - DONE KMR 2014-11-10
    4343 * ~~The "duplicate" popup has the same header as the "edit" popup ("Edit $annotation for $gene"). Could it say something more helpful, such as "Edit fields to create a new annotation for $gene"?~~ - DONE KMR 2014-11-10
    44  * The "Add ..." link for the phenotype table needs some sort of cleverness for before any genotypes are added. It would probably be simplest just to have it not appear until after there's at least one genotype available in the session (at least for now). Later we could think about having it link to the genotype-adding interface if there are no genotypes yet.
     44 * ~~The "Add ..." link for the phenotype table needs some sort of cleverness for before any genotypes are added. It would probably be simplest just to have it not appear until after there's at least one genotype available in the session (at least for now). Later we could think about having it link to the genotype-adding interface if there are no genotypes yet.~~ - DONE KMR 2014-11-10
    4545 * In the "standard" phenotype curation interface, the box for adding conditions is subtle and kind of easy to overlook.
    46   * It could probably be (a) a bit smaller and (b) not rammed up against the evidence selector (i.e. put a little bit of vertical whitespace between the evidence pulldown and the conditions box).
    47   * Maybe a bit more border, too, although there's a risk that would look naff.
     46  * It could probably be (a) a bit smaller and (b) not rammed up against the evidence selector (i.e. put a little bit of vertical whitespace between the evidence pulldown and the conditions box). - KMR 2014-11-10: I've made it a bit more obvious but we should chat about how it should look
     47  * Maybe a bit more border, too, although there's a risk that would look naff. - KMR: I haven't tried a border yet
    4848  * It'll also help to mention conditions in the header ("Choose evidence and conditions for annotating ...").
    4949 * It would be nice to have a way to edit a genotype, in case we make a mistake entering details. - MAH 2014-10-28: agreed; see ideas from today's call below