Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of CurationToolMultiGenePhenotypes

Timestamp:

Oct 24, 2014, 2:36:41 PM (6 years ago)

Author:

vw253

Comment:

--

CurationToolMultiGenePhenotypes

@@ -17 +17 @@
 === New thoughts from testing 2014-10-24 (Val) ===
 
-  *  The Genotype list  has instruction s "Add a Genotype"
-I think that for single gene mutant alleles this might be a bit opaque what the user needs to do. I think it might be more obvious if this was called
-“Genotype and allele list” and the instruction “Add an allele, or a genotype” ...although I am not welded to this and would happily go with any better suggestions (THIS ONE NEED CURATOR DISCUSSION)
+  *  The Genotype list  has instruction s "Add a Genotype" I think that for single gene mutant alleles this might be a bit opaque what the user needs to do. I think it might be more obvious if this was called “Genotype and allele list” and the instruction “Add an allele, or a genotype” ...although I am not welded to this and would happily go with any better suggestions (THIS ONE NEED CURATOR DISCUSSION)
 
-  * I think most users won't have a clue what to add for a name. We don't want them typing in the entire
- plo14-123,cdc2delta,cdc3-345 etc, but we need to make it clearer what to add.
-So, we need to say (succinctly) something  to convey  this “This is an optional “short name”, the lab strain name will do, or , another published label to enable to you to find this genotype quickly)
-“ A ‘formal’ description of the form(plo14-123,cdc2delta,cdc3-345) will be constructed from the individual alleles  in the database so you do not need to type that in here"  (THIS ONE NEED CURATOR DISCUSSION)
+  * I think most users won't have a clue what to add for a name. We don't want them typing in the entire plo14-123,cdc2delta,cdc3-345 etc, but we need to make it clearer what to add. So, we need to say (succinctly) something  to convey  this “This is a optional “short name”, the lab strain name will do, or , another published label to enable to you to find this genotype quickly) “ A ‘formal’ description of the form(plo14-123,cdc2delta,cdc3-345) will be constructed from the individual alleles  in the database so you do not need to type that in here"  (THIS ONE NEED CURATOR DISCUSSION)
 
-  * It would be nice if it were clearer when an allele had been added from the genes in your list. Maybe oce you have selected your gens for a specific genotype, once you added the allele the "add allle box" changed in some way
-(this might not be good if you have 2 allleles of the same gene) (IGNORE THIS ONE FOR NOW)
+  * It would be nice if it were clearer when an allele had been added from the genes in your list. Maybe oce you have selected your gens for a specific genotype, once you added the allele the "add allle box" changed in some way (this might not be good if you have 2 allleles of the same gene) (IGNORE THIS ONE FOR NOW)
 
- *  Details should show the
-formal name (i.e plo1-ts18,nod1delta), and the “user  given name” i.e (mystrain2)
+  *  Details should show the formal name (i.e plo1-ts18,nod1delta), and the “user  given name” i.e (mystrain2)
  
- * Choose evidence for annotating x with y -Make it clearer that here we are doing evidence AND condition
-  *1.  Suggest Select evidence  and add conditions(for x with y)
-  *2. Put a bit of separation between the evidence box and the conditions
-  *3. Previously used conditions do not get added to the list when you click on them
+  * Choose evidence for annotating x with y -Make it clearer that here we are doing evidence AND condition
+     *1.  Suggest Select evidence  and add conditions(for x with y)
+     *2. Put a bit of separation between the evidence box and the conditions
+     *3. Previously used conditions do not get added to the list when you click on them