Changes between Version 479 and Version 480 of CuratorMeeting


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jan 22, 2014, 8:42:52 PM (8 years ago)
Author:
val_wood
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • CuratorMeeting

    v479 v480  
    44
    55
    6 = Next Items, in rough order of priority =
     6= Done 21st/22 Jan=
    77
    8  == Physical Interaction Data ==
    9 
    10  * Discuss BIoGRID issue reported by Kathy yesterday, and by Henry previously
     8 * Discussed BIoGRID issue reported by Kathy yesterday, and by Henry previously
    119   * see my response waiting e-mail folder
    1210      * waiting to hear back from BioGRID
    13  
    14  * brainstorm mockup of graphical display of modifications and mutations in sequence context
    15    * Done a first pass, Val (or somebody) will mock up
     11
     12 * brainstormed mockup of graphical display of modifications and mutations in sequence context
     13   * Done a first pass, Val (or somebody) will mock up, see Ensembl variation image
     14
     15   * look at these process annotations http://www.pombase.org/spombe/result/SPAC1783.07c#fission_yeast_phenotype (compare function/ process, and consider in response to)
     16   * Val to document that annotations should be made preferentially on function with regulation targets and conditions.
     17   * Obsolete annotation in biological process can be removed
     18
     19  * text, for whether a paper contains curatable gene or not
     20  https://sourceforge.net/p/pombase/curation-tool/624/ (is this OK?) (YES, OK)
     21
     22  * text, Add allele and evidence misleading "add more alleles using this term" (non issue)
     23
     24  * evaluating curtain tool, where do people expected to go (gene page or summary page) after annotation completion? - if I have annotated a single gene I expect to stay on that page. I f I have transferred annotations I feel as though I should go back to the summary page. Or is that odd? (non issue)
     25
     26  * cut phenotype (DONE new ticket raised to correct existing term, will need to obsolete and reannotate)
     27
     28 * Antonia - Should we add GO/protein binding terms for enzyme/substrate combinations?
     29   * Antonia should we use the BioGRID evidence code "biochemical activity" which we don't use at the moment.
     30     * No but can capture high confidence with GO protein binding
     31
     32 * Discussed  when to capture physical interactions in GO using 'protein binding' in general.
     33   * Only for direct, high confidence interactions. I.e within complex, or modification/target
    1634
    1735
    18  == Quick ==
     36 = Next Items, in rough order of priority =
    1937
    20 
    21  * look at these process annotations http://www.pombase.org/spombe/result/SPAC1783.07c#fission_yeast_phenotype (compare function/ process, and consider in response to)
    22    * Val to document that annotations should be made preferentially on function woth regulation targets and conditions.
    23    * Obsolete  annotation in process can be removed
    24 
     38 
    2539 == Outreach ==
    2640