Changes between Version 631 and Version 632 of CuratorMeeting

Timestamp:

Feb 5, 2015, 5:32:29 PM (6 years ago)

Author:

vw253

Comment:

--

CuratorMeeting

@@ -59 +59 @@
           * target individual groups who have not participated, or who have stalled sessions
  
-
+   * annotate to protein complex ID (can get from PRO)?
+   * example: PMID:18723846 has direct assays showing ORC binding to origin DNA, but doesn't distinguish subunits; from other work, it's known that some but not all ORC subunits actually make contact with DNA. Annotate all to DNA binding anyway, with or without contributes_to, or annotate to a complex ID? (I'd prefer the latter but will it break anything?)
+   * same paper: similar issue for annotation extension - cdt1 or cdc18 increase ORC origin binding - put complex ID in has_regulation_target ext?
+     * Next step here is to request complex IDs for known complexes from PRO
+        * Then need to discuss what is needed to annotate to complexes (Canto, Complex pages- which data will be propagated to complex pages from gene pages and vice versa)
 
   
@@ -87 +91 @@
  * phenotypes at centromeric outer repeats - https://sourceforge.net/p/pombase/fission-yeast-phenotype/1871/
   
- 
-
- 
 
  == Annotation issues, syntax, procedures, extensions etc ==
  
- * annotate to protein complex ID (can get from PRO)?
-   * example: PMID:18723846 has direct assays showing ORC binding to origin DNA, but doesn't distinguish subunits; from other work, it's known that some but not all ORC subunits actually make contact with DNA. Annotate all to DNA binding anyway, with or without contributes_to, or annotate to a complex ID? (I'd prefer the latter but will it break anything?)
-   * same paper: similar issue for annotation extension - cdt1 or cdc18 increase ORC origin binding - put complex ID in has_regulation_target ext?
-
  * protein domain specific binding, see example in e-mail