Changes between Version 29 and Version 30 of InhouseMeetingQuestions


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 14, 2011, 11:51:37 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
antonialock
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • InhouseMeetingQuestions

    v29 v30  
    55At the moment I annotate the has_substrate relationship on the underlying assumption that the user should be able to infer whether the substrate is a protein product or RNA (for instance kinase X has the substrate GeneDBSpombe Y). I suspect that this might be quite an inaccurate way of doing it and might come back and haunt us in the future (especially if we want to build automated pathway overviews etc). Should I actually be crossreferencing PRO ID's (and what about mRNA?)
    66
    7 '''Jira''' [[BR]]
     7'''Genie''' [[BR]]
    88How do I know what things to run through Jira? Just things like "regulation" etc relating to existing terms? [[BR]]
    99