Changes between Version 31 and Version 32 of InhouseMeetingQuestions


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 15, 2011, 10:42:43 AM (10 years ago)
Author:
antonialock
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • InhouseMeetingQuestions

    v31 v32  
    22== 14-15 November, 2011 (3-4 November, 2011) ==
    33
    4 '''has_substrate''' [[BR]]
     4'''done - has_substrate''' [[BR]]
     5use systematic ID for now. Is inferred from context. Can add .1 for transcripts (mRNA substrates). [[BR]]
    56At the moment I annotate the has_substrate relationship on the underlying assumption that the user should be able to infer whether the substrate is a protein product or RNA (for instance kinase X has the substrate GeneDBSpombe Y). I suspect that this might be quite an inaccurate way of doing it and might come back and haunt us in the future (especially if we want to build automated pathway overviews etc). Should I actually be crossreferencing PRO ID's (and what about mRNA?).
    67
    7 '''Genie''' [[BR]]
     8
     9
     10'''done - Genie''' [[BR]]
    811How do I know what things to run through Jira? Just things like "regulation" etc relating to existing terms? [[BR]]
    912
    1013'''helpdesk''' [[BR]]
    11 a tour [[BR]]
     14Will go through this next time.
     15[[BR]]
     16a tour
    1217
    1318